Performance Art at the Whitney Museum

For our fifth field trip, we visited the Rituals of Rented Island exhibition at the Whitney museum. Many of the temporal arts displayed here reflected events that occurred between 1970's through the 1980's in Manhattan. In my opinion, many of the pieces give off a strange energy as if there was a lot of negative emotion behind the art. Many of the pieces seemed to be inspired by dark times.  


The first piece I selected was titled “Passing Through” by Sylvia Palacios Whitman completed in 1941. The piece is a pair of giant paper hands that the artist wears over her real hands and moves as if she is walking. Her giant hands move up and down creating this weird robotic movement. In an interview with the artist, she mentioned that the hands were like an extension of herself. In my opinion it seemed that she was interested in the exaggerated hands to bring attention towards her as an artist or as a person, maybe she felt she was unnoticeable without the big hands and that her message was not getting across to others.   


The second piece I had selected was the “The Original Lou and Walter Story” by Jill Kroesen completed in 1978. This piece was another video of the artist sitting in the center of a bunch of pyramids. She begins to tell a story about a town that is controlled by a sheriff and all the women from that town live in the outskirts by themselves. The story seems to be a metaphor for women’s rights until she begins talking about her death. At that point, the story gets strange and seems to lose any connection to other references.
 

The third piece I had selected from the exhibit was titled "Claim" by the artist Vito Acconci, completed in the year 1971. The piece was a sixty-minute video recording that displayed the artist with a blindfold guarding a basement with two metal pipes and a crowbar. The recording was also shown through another television in front of the entrance of the door  as a warning to potential visitors. Throughout the video, the artist repeats to himself “I’m alone in the basement. I want to stay alone in the basement.” making him appear extremely hostile and mentally unstable. In an interview with the artist, he discussed how he used the repetition as a form of hypnosis to keep himself going, because he did not like what he was doing. He also said he needed the blindfold to help him view anyone coming in as abstractions in his mind, because he knew he could not do such a thing to anyone while being aware. He also stated he created this piece to “claim” the basement as his own in the face of society.

Finally, I think all of the pieces from this exhibition were completed during difficult times. They seem to send out a message without directly saying what it is. It is like the artists wanted the viewer to put the pieces together and figure out what was their inspiration. During the interview video with Vito Acconci, he mentioned some people said his piece was a response to the events of the Vietnam war. He said his inspiration did not come from the war, which was occurring at the time even though that is what it appeared to be. This further proves my understanding that all these works of art never truly specify if the events of their time period truly affected their art work. 


Sylvia Palacios Whitman                                        Jill Kroesen
"Passing Through"                                      "The Original Lou and Walter Story"
Acrylic on paper                                                   Unknown medium 
1941                                                                        1978


Vito Acconci
"Claim"
pipes, crowbar, blindfold
1971

LES Galleries Reaction

For the fourth class field trip, we visited the Lower East Side Galleries and took a look at some of the work of up and coming artists. We visited the Bosi contemporary gallery, Untitled gallery and the McKenzie fine arts gallery among a few others. In comparison to the Chelsea galleries we visited a few weeks ago, the LES galleries were smaller in size and seemed to display more photographs and sculptures than paintings. The Bosi gallery had specific pieces displayed on televisions and projectors as well as framed pictures and it only had two paintings. The McKenzie fine arts gallery out the few that we visited was the only one that specifically displayed paintings, it was the most similar to the galleries in Chelsea. The Untitled gallery mainly displayed sculptures and also had two paintings that hung from the ceiling, one in the entrance of the gallery and one in the main display area. I noticed in the LES galleries that there was much less works of art in terms of quantity. It seemed as if the designers of the LES galleries wanted the viewers to take more time observing each individual piece. One thing both sets of galleries did have in common, was the use of the same white walls to display the art. It seems that the white walls help bring out the colors and the design of the art work to grab the viewers attention. The Chelsea galleries all seemed to be themed, and mainly displayed paintings of specific known artists. The LES galleries may have been displaying the work of one artist but the art was not limited to only paintings. Overall the galleries on either side of lower Manhattan had some similarities and some differences. They both seemed to cater to different people, the LES galleries had a newer, bolder approach in the art and photographs that were displayed in comparison to the highly themed paintings displayed in the Chelsea galleries. Being able to visit the galleries has definitely expanded my thoughts and understanding of how art is sold and how artists make a profit.